Home

Add to Favorites

An Interview with Thomas Metzinger: What Is the Self?

You Are Not Who You Think You Are
Michael Taft

Thomas Metzinger, Ph.D. Professor of Theoretical Philosophy, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Thomas Metzinger is currently Professor of Theoretical Philosophy at the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz and an Adjunct Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Study (FIAS). He is also Director of the Neuroethics Research Unit in Mainz and Director of the MIND Group at the FIAS.

 

Michael W. Taft:  You’ve written at great length about the experience of selfhood in human beings. So let’s start off by asking, What is the self?

Thomas Metzinger: The first thing to understand, I believe, is that there is no thing like “the self.” Nobody ever had or was a self. Selves are not part of reality, in the sense of elementary building blocks that endure over time. The first person pronoun “I” doesn’t refer to an individual object like a football or a bicycle, or to some mysterious category of invisible things—it just points to the speaker of the current sentence. The speaker simply is the person as a whole.

A self also couldn’t be something you “have” (as we might say it), because then there would be another little man hiding behind it and owning the self. It also couldn’t be something deep inside yourself, because the you would be identical with only one of your constituting parts. We are living systems, embodied, dynamic. In short, there is no thing in the brain or outside in the world, which is us. We are processes.

Selves are a very interesting and vivid and robust element of conscious experience in some animals. This is a conscious experience of selfhood, something philosophers call a phenomenal self, and how this self subjectively appears to the organism as a whole is entirely determined by local processes in the brain, at every instant, from moment to moment. Ultimately, it’s a physical process. Today, the best way to describe self consciousness still is as a representational process: an image that is sometimes generated in the brain, an internal placeholder for the system as a whole, a neurocomputational tool. Sometimes it’s not generated, for example in dreamless, deep sleep. It’s a very fragile and vulnerable, intermittent phenomenon, but there is no metaphysical entity such as the self which exists independently of the brain.


Michael W. Taft: Yet the experience of being a self, of being someone, is very persistent.

Thomas Metzinger: Absolutely—that is the amazing part of it: Something virtual is experienced as a reality, the system’s currently best hypothesis about itself becomes something that feels substantial a lived reality. It’s the robust phenomenology of the self—the very convincing sense that we are somebody—that makes this naïve misunderstanding so very easy for beings like us.  I think the self is an intermittent and complex process, but not a thing. This is not provocative at all, a dramatic statement or dramatic new theory. I would guess that most cognitive scientists, neuroscientists, and almost all philosophers today would subscribe to the idea that is there no thing or metaphysical substance like the self that can exist independently of the brain. In science and philosophy, the concept of such a metaphysical self is long gone.

But somehow for our life, and in our biological history, the feeling of being a self is and was very important, and for many reasons. Complex organisms do not only have to predict the world, but also their own future behavior—they have to minimize surprise on all levels. They have to successfully control themselves, as a whole. A conscious self-model is a perfect tool to achieve this. If an animal or a child wants to learn how to develop future planning, control momentary impulses, delay rewards and so on, then it is critical that it has an inner image of itself—however delusional—that tells it: “It is you who will reap the fruits in the future; it is yourself who will get lung cancer if you keep on smoking; your preferences will remain stable and it will be your very own joy, satisfaction, your own suffering and regret!” One thing we are all beginning to understand is how self-deception can be adaptive. Probably evolution has built some stable forms of self-deception right into our conscious self-models. One important function is mortality denial, I guess. We like to believe in an innermost essence or core, because it allows us to deny our finitude, or at least leave an open door of hope for life after death. And that’s also why it’s not going to go away. I think the folk-psychological, folk-metaphysical notion of self is going to stay in our everyday life and in our culture.


Michael W. Taft: If the self is some kind of transient mental representation, what is its function?

Thomas Metzinger: The body and the mind are constantly changing. Nothing in us is ever really the same from one moment to the next. Yet the self represents a very strong phenomenal experience of sameness, and it’s clear this would be adaptive or helpful for a biological organism that needs to plan for the future. If you want to hide some food for winter or you want to save some money in your bank accounts or work on your reputation, you’re planning for future success and you wouldn’t do that if you didn’t have the very strong feeling that it’s going to be the same entity that gets the reward in the future. That it was the same entity in the past that got cheated, injured, hurt by someone, and that is now longing for retaliation, revenge, or something like that. Obviously, for the evolution of culture, a fiction of personal identity was also necessary. Just think about responsibility and culpability in the context of evolving a legal system; or of the need to build a reputation in larger, growing groups of early human history. A self-model is not something in the brain or in philosophy, it is also something social and public. Personal websites and Facebook accounts are public self-models too—they have a function, and they make something happen.

So obviously in a biological or bodily context it may be good to have this experience that all of this, the reaping of the fruits, is going to happen to the same person. But again, strictly speaking, it’s never really happening to the same person, but it’s also not true that there is nobody there. Of course, there is a sufficient similarity over time, the organism survives, genes are copied, books are written. We don’t arbitrarily change and it’s kind of a flux. I like very much the image the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once used.

He said you could have a rope—a long rope made of very different strings of different color. And no string, neither the red string nor the blue nor the green one, would go through the whole length of the rope. Yet the rope could be very robust, strong, and stable, even though there is not one thread that goes through it from beginning to end. I think that’s a good image for how we are on the bodily level, as well as on a psychological level.

Despite this, we have robust experiences of autonomy and self-determination. We have the subjective experience of controlling our behavior, and we also have an experience of mental self- determination, controlling our attention, our mental state and all of these things. As modern science shows, some of these inner experiences may not be fully veridical, but just adaptive. Perhaps some of them are also efficient self-fulfilling prophecies. It may be functional to have the robust experience that you are in control, but from the thirdperson perspective of science, it seems that such experiences may not reflect the truth of our nature. What really happens is perhaps best described as an agent-free process of dynamical self-organization. This process has many layers – from the bodily to the social – and it manifests itself in itself, through conscious experience. Whenever we don’t understand something, we hallucinate a little man right into reality: a computer that suddenly “acts up”, weather gods causing thunder and throwing down lightning bolts, invisible demons causing diseases, Cartesian Egos that deliberately think their very own thoughts. It may work for a while, but it also causes considerable confusion. The self is not a thing, but a process.



 

Clarence McKinney
5 years ago

I wonder what is the difference between the self that Mr. Metzinger is referring to, and the physical organism—the human being—that obviously does exist.

Karen Wilmarth
5 years ago

This interview brings to mind the quote "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man." But I still feel a definite kinship with my past self, even if we're not exactly identical, and I have trouble thinking of my self as not "real".

I think the only self that exists, exists on the level of clarity/pure awareness that underlies all consciousness. Our sense of an individual self exists merely as a wave on that ocean. Nondualism is not a new idea, but one that's finding new expression in some of the teachers alive today: Ekhardt Tolle, Adyashanti, Pema Chodron, Thich Nhat Hanh, Candice O'Denver (my personal favorite), to name just a few.

Lindsay Starke
5 years ago

The self: humankind's most remarkable tool?

Ernest Barker
5 years ago

Self says I, "What do you think? Self, self ....  where did you go?". Oh no, self has left me. "Come back self, come back.  I promise to good, please come back, I need someone to talk to".  I must admit that I also think that self is a process, but at the same time it is a thing.  And, I do enjoy a little solitude, alone with the process of self. I see very little difference in a process and a thing.  A program running in the hardware of a computer is nothing more than a process and at the sametime it is a thing, I can interacte some programs just as I do with self. This comment is nothing more than the process of me writing my thoughts.  Yet this is a real thing, you are reading a real comment.

Lenny Peterson
3 years ago

Actually I want to open a new blog for this reason I was looking for getting some information about it. This is a good article which can help me more. Thanks and inform like this.
Greetings from viagra

dunkan mackclaud
3 years ago

Wonderful article, thanks for putting this together! This is obviously one great post.

http://viagraonlineplus.ch/

kelvin johanes
3 years ago

Thanks for sharing this article. Very Nice Posting. motorup , motormy, kiwibox

lili ana
3 years ago

I downloaded mxf converter  free trial version last week, and With this perfect mxf converter mac software, you can convert MXF to H.264 MOV for QuickTime, convert MXF to AIC MOV for editing in iMovie, convert mxf files to ProRes MOV for FCP X importing.

fanSG fanSDG
2 years ago

cheap michael kors outlet uk essential-ii High-class) about the global High end items pertains to cheap michael kors uk a beyond people your survival and exploitation Michael Kors Handbags UK wants, distinctive, rare in addition to extraordinary qualities of michael kors handbags outlet uk customer things", also referred to as the actual necessaries connected with existence. Inwards economic science, the luxurious products refers back to the michael kors outlet uk price/relationship rate from the most suitable products. Glimpse by an additional michael kors outlet uk Position, high end is actually refers back to the intangible benefit/real worth romantic relationship with all the top relation involving cheap michael kors uk product. It's in general believed that the intake of high-class products is a Michael Kors Handbags UK in high spirits-quality use conduct. In the The english language dictionary, Luxury is essential-ii Luxury, Luxus. Luxus is usually a Latin michael kors handbags outlet uk concept, significance "sturdy sperm count", after the progression connected with spend along with michael kors cheap uk extra. Nearly all Western european different languages have assimilated the style, exclusively, the term used to illustrate in the operation michael kors bags uk online from the manufacturing and use of all types of products over and above the necessary level of charges and several part of lifestyle. Michael Kors Uk , Wolfgang lutz, the within the very best-selling high-class land rich this kind of definition of luxurious: "luxury Michael Kors Handbags UK is a kind of entire or even partially by means of his or her respected societal thinking is really a magnificent life style, generally based on the goods or even service." At this point, the thought of michael kors outlet uk lavishness merchandise in the world is definitely "a kind of outside of citizenry tactical and improvement needs, distinctive, hard to find cheap michael kors uk and uncommon features regarding buyer items", also referred to as the particular necessaries of lifetime. Inside the reasoning behind cheap michael kors outlet uk Chinese language extravagance things is actually the same as covetousness, godforsaken, spend. The truth is, in the Michael Kors Handbags UK financial sense, luxurious substance is a kind of in high spirits-quality client habits, as such devoid of encouragement or perhaps michael kors uk online pin the consequence on. On the interpersonal good sense, is a form of cheap michael kors uk personal class along with the improvement with the quality of life. Economic science will be looked as the increase associated with interest on its cheap michael kors handbags online extravagance goods can be over earnings development. It might be extremely vast Michael Kors Uk opportunity, coming from nin-sin, company-epithet timepieces in order to high-class autos, may very well be luxuries. Michael Kors Handbags UK Nonetheless, generally persons consider luxurious could be the Michael Kors Uk Sale very costly products, namely many individuals do not want in order to use. Many luxurious is just not Cheap Michael Kors Handbags On Sale expected and also with no actual usage of expensive objects, for instance cheap michael kors ukwell-known sword luggage, haute couture as well as lavishness automobiles. Secret planes along with luxury yachts, naturally, additionally belong to michael kors handbags outlet ukyour class of lavishness things. NPC - marcus is just one of Our country's features one hundred cheap michael kors uk numerous years of account, largely to control high end michael kors uk online high-end mall archipelago. Inside 03 2012, the actual NPC - marcus in order to provide this domestic power appeal approach to type in the cheap michael kors bags uk China market, after seven weeks cheap michael kors uk involving NPC - marcus age-business system, introduced with The far east, along with the operations michael kors uk online heart along with storage place are situated inside Shanghai. Michael Kors Handbags UK "Lavishness" can be a widely use d idea, refers to the cardinal-ii high end throughout cheap michael kors handbags online The english language. What exactly is key-2 Luxury? Oxford superior book michael kors uk online points out: a thing that is pricey along with pleasant but is not michael kors handbags outlet uk sale essential. Cambridge advanced thesaurus explains: a thing expensive that's pleasant along with yet Michael Kors Handbags UK is not needed; Webster's dictionary account is: anything exacerbating satisfaction or perhaps ease although not essential. Through the about three Michael Kors Outlet Store UK thesaurus, the meaning regarding critical-2 michael kors uk online lavishness approximately three tips: good, your, not essential. Although China cheap michael kors handbags uk online description of "throw away a total waste of funds, pursue experiencing" approximately http://www.comt.ca/mk.html also contains the 3 features, but also in regards to manifestation, The english language practically Michael Kors Handbags Canada natural definitely, certainly not excessively minus. But perhaps the Michael Kors Factory British reason, in fact seriously isn't a superb outline. Full, your own, the 3 can be a relative http://www.trirudy.com/mk3.cfm conception, not necessary to explain a noun might be ok, yet have to do many rigorous school michael kors canada conversation, I am just scared definitely not, precisely how excellent, the way costly, not necessary michael kors handbags canada to become additional high end. Just might use the eighty/20 principle to be able to establish, thirty% regarding related merchandise in the Michael Kors Canada most suitable products, concurrently pertaining to 60% of the people is dear and not for-essential items, it's possible Michael kors canada we can call it an extra. 70/xx, obviously, is an informal means, we are able to besides in further michael kors handbags canada item, like ninety days/12 to speciate on the luxurious leading luxury things. During these about three ideas, the best control Michael Kors Outlet should be the conception is needed. As long as all of us survey the marketplace potential http://www.cci-icc.gc.ca/mk.aspx of this product, discover how a lot of people can have this system, may estimated at appraise the degree on this strategy is not required. Everyone desire to beverage, one example is, determines the 100% discuss 

mas ion
2 years ago

These news are really great and I am so glad finding it in your site. As I see this blog is full of such valuable information like this publication so I will definitely bookmark it. Thanks again for informing us.
Greetings from Sbobet | Ibcbet | Agen Bola
Agen Ibcbet | Agen Bola Terpercaya | agen poker | dewa poker